Leading a class discussion

From CrowdsourcingSeminar
Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Guidelines

Each day, class will consist of a discussion of the assigned papers. Each student will be asked to lead at least one discussion during the semester. On the day of your discussion, please submit your materials (slides, notes, etc.) by editing the class page on this wiki. You should plan for your discussion to fill one hour.

There are several goals for the discussion:

  • To lead a conversation about the papers, covering topics much like those that would be covered in a critique. You should not do all the talking, but you need to be willing to step in at any point when no one else is providing new ideas or questions.
  • To get people talking! One great way to do this is to break people into pairs or small groups for a minute or two to think about a question. Pairs and small groups give more students a chance to participate, and they help students get ideas and words flowing.
  • To touch on the high and low level parts of the readings. High level concepts are important, they help us anchor on the topic and give us some motivation for a research topic, but also don't be afraid to really dive into the details of how a study was performed, or whether the right research question was asked.
  • Assume people have read the papers and are ready to talk. Keep any summary short. If you get a sense that students are unclear on some of the concepts, feel free to recap important points and details; but in general, focus on discussion, not summarization.

Before class on the day of your discussion, read through all other students' critiques. (They will be posted for by the morning on the wiki). You are expected to weave ideas from everyone's critiques into the discussion.

After class, please summarize the most salient points from the class discussion on the wiki.